Objects
Starfield, Sue, Paltridge, Brian, McMurtrie, Robert, Holbrook, Allyson, Lovat, Terry, Kiley, Margaret, Fairbairn, Hedy. Pergamon; 2017. Evaluation and instruction in PhD examiners' reports: how grammatical choices construe examiner roles.
Kiley, Margaret, Holbrook, Allyson, Lovat, Terence, Fairbairn, Hedy, Starfield, Sue, Paltridge, Brian. National Tertiary Education Union (NTEU); 2018. An oral component in PhD examination in Australia: Issues and considerations.
Starfield, Sue, Paltridge, Brian, McMurtrie, Robert, Holbrook, Allyson, Bourke, Sid, Fairbairn, Hedy, Kiley, Margaret, Lovat, Terry. Pergamon Press; 2015. Understanding the language of evaluation in examiners' reports on doctoral theses.
Clement, Neville, Lovat, Terence, Holbrook, Allyson, Kiley, Margaret, Bourke, Sid, Paltridge, Brian, Starfield, Sue, Fairbairn, Hedy, McInerney, Dennis M.. Emerald; 2015. Exploring doctoral examiner judgements through the lenses of Habermas and epistemic cognition.
Lovat, Terence, Holbrook, Allyson, Bourke, Sid, Fairbairn, Hedy, Kiley, Margaret, Paltridge, Brian, Starfield, Sue. Tyrrell Burgess; 2015. Examining doctoral examination and the question of the Viva.